A.No cause of action arises till the date of marriage
B.On account of ‘X’s going mad, the contract is frustrated and thus void. Y has no right to sue for damages
C.The contract itself is void
D.Y is guilty of breach of contract
A.Valid
B.Void
C.Voidable
D.Non est
A.The bailment of goods as security for payment of a debt or performance of a promise
B.The delivery of goods by one person to another for some purpose, upon a contract that they shall, when the purpose is accomplished, be returned or otherwise disposed of according to the direction of the person delivering them
C.A contract by which one party promises to save the other from loss caused to him by the contract of the promisor himself, or by the conduct of any other person
D.A contract to do or not to do something, if some event, collateral to such contract, does or does not happen
A.Cercion of the will of the parties
B.Fraud
C.Mistake
D.Voluntary will of the parties
A.Lalman Shukla v. Gauri Datt
B.Carlill v. Carbolic Smoke Ball Comp.
C.Both A and B
D.None of the above
A.Dharamdas Ghoshe
B.Brahmo Dutt
C.Mohri Bibee
D.Kedar Nath
A.Invitation to offer
B.Promise
C.Offer
D.Invitation for acceptance
A.There is no contract as the debt is already barred by limitation and so it cannot be revived by a subsequent promise
B.There is no contract because the mother has promised to give only a part of the debt
C.This is a contract because there is a natural love and affection relation and the promise is in writing and signed
D.This is enforceable against the mother because such a promise is valid and binding under the Indian Contract Act
A.Only Against ‘C’
B.Only Against ‘B’
C.Against ‘B’ or ‘C’ or both
D.Neither against ‘B’ nor ‘C’
A.“That the parties to a contract are free to determine for themselves what primary obligations they will accept“
B.”That the parties can claim damages for breach of contract”
C.”That the parties can decide for themselves what restitutionary relief they can give to the other”
D.None of the above
