A.Quantum Meruit
B.Rescission
C.Injunction
D.Specific Performance
A.Wagering contract
B.Unlawful contract
C.Contingent contract
D.Voidable contract
A.Suit for damages
B.Suit for injunction
C.Suit for ‘quantum meruit’
D.Suit for specific performance
A.180 of the Act
B.181 of the Act
C.182 of the Act
D.183 of the Act
A.By performance
B.By breach of the contract
C.By novation
D.By a mere delay in performance
A.Time is presumed to be of the essence of the contract
B.Time is not presumed to be of the essence of the contract
C.Both A and B
D.No presumption as to time can be raised
A.Void as the consent of B,the daughter, has not been taken
B.Void because of being immoral
C.Voidable at the instance of B
D.Valid as A and C entered into contract with their free consent
A.Agreement illegal in nature
B.Agreement not enforceable by law
C.Agreement violating legal procedure
D.Agreement against public policy
A.The latter is not bound to make compensation to the former
B.The latter is bound to make compensation to the former
C.The former is forbidden to accept compensation from the latter
D.The latter if a Government is not bound to make compensation to the former
A.The latter is not bound to make compensation to the former
B.The latter is bound to make compensation to the former
C.The former is forbidden to accept compensation from the latter
D.The latter if a Government is not bound to make compensation to the former
