The observation that Article 30(1) is not a charter of mal-administration was made in the case of
A.Saifuddin v. State of Bombay
B.Maneka Gandhi v. UOI
C.St. Stephen’s College v. University of Delhi
D.Mittal v. UOI
A.Saifuddin v. State of Bombay
B.Maneka Gandhi v. UOI
C.St. Stephen’s College v. University of Delhi
D.Mittal v. UOI
A.Direct reduction in the number of members in the Finance Commission
B.Proclaim financial emergency
C.Impose President’s Rule in any State
D.Direct Parliament to pass special Financial Bill
A.The President of India
B.The Vice-President of India
C.The Speaker of the House of the People
D.The Chief Justice of India
A.Article 19
B.Article 20
C.Article 21, 22
D.All of the above
A.88th
B.89th
C.86th
D.84th
A.Fundamental duties are self-executing
B.Fundamental duties are not selfexecuting
C.The State must make laws for the implementation of fundamental duties
D.Mandamus cannot be sought against an individual who does not observe his fundamental duties
A.Sarla Mudgal v. Union of India
B.Mafatlal Industries Ltd. v. Union of India
C.Chander Mohan v. Union of India
D.Unni Krishnan v. State of Andhra Pradesh
A.Fundamental right
B.Natural right
C.Constitutional right
D.Legal right
A.1 only
B.2 only
C.Both 1 and 2
D.Neither 1 nor 2
A.One hour
B.Unspecified
C.30 minutes
D.Two hours